It’s always been my policy that the only correct response to
give any reviewer of my books is a polite thank you, whether the review is good
or bad. I still maintain that’s the only acceptable response to a review of my
books. HOWEVER, and this is where I am speaking from today, as a reader, I have
some very real issues with many of the reviews I’m reading on blog sites,
Amazon sites, and Goodreads… which once WAS good-reads, and is now another
corner stop for trashing authors with impunity.
My complaint or in some cases my bitch with amateur reviews
is a complex yet simple thing. Firstly, let’s address those pesky snarks about
grammar and typos. Well yes, everybody makes typing mistakes, and sometimes the
proofreaders for publishing houses DO miss the occasional typo. This is a
helluva lot different than self-published books, which sometimes have many
uncorrected and obvious spelling errors because the author didn’t employ a
proofreader. What I’ve noticed and this is what annoys the crap out of me
honestly, is the vast number of reviewers who think it’s their job not to
review and assess the story they’ve read, but the editorial decisions made
about it. AND while they’re complaining about bad grammar and spelling errors,
they reveal their own lack of skill in constructing a grammatically correct and
properly spelled sentence. So, before you continue to demerit stars in your
rating for what you consider poor grammar, look at your own. It’s difficult to
take seriously a review in which the reviewer can’t use a contraction, doesn’t
understand the different between your and you’re, or they’re and there/their.
Ask any author how annoying that shit is?
Then there’s the reviewer who down-rates your book because
it’s not what she/he expected. I’ve seen opening remarks that are laughable–I
picked up this book expecting it to be ______________ (fill in the genre) and I
was so disappointed to discover it was ________________(fill in the blank).
Then the next comment is, so I’m giving it X-stars because it wasn’t what I
wanted. And this is the author’s fault why? YOU didn’t read the blurb, or the
back cover, so the author is at fault for your disappointment? I even had one
reviewer rewrite my blurb to what she thought it should have been, and trust me,
it made very little sense given what the book was about.
Just recently one of my books that has consistently been
given 5 stars was reviewed by a blogger who was totally contradictory in her
remarks–it should have been 50 pages longer at one point, and two sentences
later it should have been cut several dozen pages, or at least cut out the
number of sex scenes. Let me point out now that this title is an Ellora’s Cave
Quickie™ title. Soooo…. What part of Quickie needs explaining? By definition a
“quickie” is a highly erotic, explosive encounter that happens quickly–hence
the name. Ellora’s Cave has defined the line, and sex is expected to happen
fast and intense. IF you don’t want to read content that is highly sexual, why
have you chosen a Quickie to review? You are already predisposed to dislike the
book, no matter how it’s setup or executed by the author. How fair are you
going to be to this author and his/her book? If erotic content offends you in
any way, choose books more suited to your taste if you expect to be taken
seriously by readers, and authors.
How many authors have been subjected to the endless rant
review? Where one point in a novel length story touches a nerve and it becomes
all the “reviewer” (yes we are now using quotes for this one), sees and talks
about–nothing else exists once you hit this nerve and it makes the reviewer
crazy because of their highly personal response to it. A professional reviewer
would decline to review, but in some bloggers this is a call to battle and they
begin… reams and reams of emotionally charged verbal carnage that doesn’t even
make sense, never mind read in a coherent, grammatically correct fashion. Then
they solicit their friends to jump in and add their venom to the mix. How
seriously is this shit supposed to be taken? Really? I’ve seen it, and it stuns
me.
Reviews are supposed to be balanced and thoughtful
observations that help potential readers choose books that will suit their
tastes and appeal to them. How can ranting insanity help anyone decide more than
the reviewer has clearly gone batshit crazy? Goodreads was once a good place to
get balanced reviews, now it’s Amazon’s little sister in the poison war… Get
your nose out of joint and you can login and start rating an author’s works
with one star, without ever reading a word–to pay them back for some real or
imagined slight. How valid is that? It has nothing to do with books, and
everything to do with petty and malicious bitch trolling.
At the end of the day, the fact remains, over half the
people reviewing books have no clue how to do it properly and with any kind of
constructive observation to help readers choose whether or not to read the book
in question. Many use their reviews as a way to be mean, self-important, and
just plain shit-ignorant. If you want balanced and thoughtful reviews to help
you decide on a new author or title, your best bet is still to visit wonderful
and respected sites like these:
That’s only a few I use and trust, there are many other
well-respected sites, so take the time to find them. And all you amateur
reviewers, take a moment and think before you put your poison pen to the page…
if you can’t be fair, maybe you need to ask yourself why you’re going to trash
someone you don’t even know. And while you’re thinking on that, remember if
you’re going to crap all over someone for incorrect grammar and spelling, make
damn sure you check your own.
Now that I’ve made myself really popular, the floor is open
for comments… fire away, but remember–spelling and good grammar counts!! *lol*
Peace and love to all…